Explore how our minds swiftly form mental patterns, often at the cost of accuracy. We'll unpack Daniel Kahneman's insights into System 1's tendency to fabricate order, the pitfalls of cognitive bias, and the valuable contrast with System 2's slow, statistical reasoning.
Chapter 1
Dr. Esther Hattingh
Hello again, and welcome back to Thinking Fast and Slow. Iâm Dr. Esther Hattingh, and today weâre diving into something that, honestly, I see all the time in my workâhow our minds are just so quick to make sense of the world, sometimes a little too quick. If youâve been following along, youâll remember in our last episode we talked about System 1 and System 2âthose two ways our brains process information, with System 1 being the fast, automatic one, and System 2 the slower, more deliberate thinker. Today, weâre going to look at how System 1 keeps this running mental model of whatâs normal, and how it deals with surprises.
Dr. Esther Hattingh
So, System 1 is always busy, right? Itâs constantly updating its idea of whatâs normal in our environment. When something unexpected happens, it doesnât just sit there and go, âOh, thatâs odd.â No, it immediately tries to fit that surprise into the story itâs already telling itself. I mean, think about itâif you see two strange things happen in a row, your mind will almost automatically try to connect them, even if thereâs no real link. Itâs like, âWell, that must mean something!â But, statistically, maybe it doesnât. Thatâs where System 2 should step in, but, as weâve discussed, System 2 is a bit lazy unless it really has to get involved.
Dr. Esther Hattingh
I actually had a situation like this in my own work, designing educational programs. There was this one time when a group of students started behaving in a way that just didnât fit the usual pattern. My first instinctâmy System 1âwas to come up with a quick explanation. âOh, it must be because of the new assessment format,â I thought. But, when I actually went back and looked at the data, it turned out there were a few other factors at playâthings I wouldnât have noticed if Iâd just stuck with my first impression. Itâs so easy to rationalize surprises, to just weave them into the story we already believe, but thatâs not always the most accurate way to understand whatâs really going on.
Dr. Esther Hattingh
And, you know, this tendency to jump to causal explanationsâeven when the real answer is more complicated or statisticalâcan lead us astray. System 1 wants a neat story, but sometimes, life is just messy. Thatâs where we need to pause and let System 2 do its thing, even if it takes a bit more effort.
Chapter 2
Dr. Esther Hattingh
Now, building on that, letâs talk about what happens when System 1âs need for a coherent story goes a bit too far. This is where confirmation bias comes in. System 1 loves a good story, and it really doesnât like anything that contradicts it. So, if you already believe something, youâre much more likely to notice evidence that supports your belief and ignore anything that doesnât fit. Thatâs confirmation bias in action.
Dr. Esther Hattingh
Thereâs also something called the halo effect, which is kind of a cousin to confirmation bias. If you like one thing about a person, youâre more likely to assume youâll like everything else about them, too. Itâs like your brain just wants everything to line up neatly. Kahneman has a great term for thisâWYSIATI, or âWhat You See Is All There Is.â Basically, your mind works with whatever information is right in front of it, and it doesnât go looking for whatâs missing. Thatâs a bit scary, isnât it? Because it means weâre often making decisions with only part of the picture.
Dr. Esther Hattingh
I see this all the time in professional and academic settings. Letâs say reviewing a studentâs work, and you already have an impressionâmaybe they did well on the first assignment, so one expect the student to do well again. One might overlook mistakes or give the student the benefit of the doubt, just because your mind wants the story to stay consistent. Or, in a meeting, if someone you respect suggests an idea, you might be more likely to agree, even if thereâs evidence itâs not the best approach. Itâs not that weâre being lazy, exactlyâitâs just that System 1 is so good at making us feel like weâve got all the information we need, even when we donât.
Dr. Esther Hattingh
And, I mean, Iâm definitely guilty of this myself. Sometimes I catch myself thinking, âWell, I havenât heard anything to the contrary, so this must be right.â But, as weâve discussed in previous episodes, thatâs exactly when we need to slow down and ask, âWhat am I missing here?â Itâs not easy, but itâs so important if we want to make better decisions.
Chapter 3
Dr. Esther Hattingh
Alright, letâs shift gears a bit and talk about one of my favorite analogies from Kahnemanâthe Tetris analogy. If youâve ever played Tetris, you know how it starts off slow, with just a few blocks, and you can easily fit them together. Thatâs cognitive ease. Everything fits, you feel in control, and your mind is happy. But as the game speeds up, more blocks start piling up, and suddenly itâs not so easy anymore. Thatâs cognitive strainâwhen your mind has to work harder to make sense of new, sometimes conflicting information.
Dr. Esther Hattingh
System 1 is like a novice Tetris player, just focused on the blocks right in front of them, trying to make patterns out of whatâs immediately available. It doesnât really plan ahead or think about what might come next. System 2, on the other hand, is like an expert playerâalways thinking a few moves ahead, considering different possibilities, and managing the chaos as things get more complicated.
Dr. Esther Hattingh
Iâve definitely felt this in my own work, especially when Iâm introducing new educational technology tools into a curriculum. At first, everything seems straightforwardâthereâs that sense of cognitive ease. But then, as you dig deeper, all these unexpected challenges start to pop up. Suddenly, youâre in cognitive strain, trying to fit all these new âblocksâ into your existing system. It can be overwhelming, but itâs also where real learning and growth happen, if you let System 2 take the wheel for a bit.
Dr. Esther Hattingh
So, as we wrap up todayâs episode, just rememberâour minds are amazing at making sense of the world, but sometimes they do it a little too quickly. Next time you find yourself jumping to conclusions or feeling like everything fits just a bit too neatly, take a step back. Ask yourself, âAm I seeing the whole picture, or just whatâs right in front of me?â Thanks for joining me, and I hope youâll tune in next time as we keep exploring how we think, fast and slow.
About the podcast
Daniel Kahnemanâs theory Kahneman begins by explaining the purpose of his book: to provide people with a richer vocabulary for discussing and identifying errors in judgment. He briefly traces his professional interest in the psychology of judgment and decision-making, illustrated with examples of human intuition's successes and failures. Lastly, Kahneman offers a broad overview of Thinking, Fast and Slow, starting with the functions of two complementary "systems" of cognition and describing the heuristics, or rules of thumb, these systems depend on. In the "Origins" section of the introduction, Kahneman discusses his research and his late thought partner, Amos Tversky, at length. Tversky's contributions were central to Kahneman's work and success.